Right to Life
Pandemics and the Liberal Path
The record shows that the global economy collapsed not because of the COVID-19 pandemic but because governments around the world, through an astonishing and grossly irresponsible use of coercive power, crushed businesses and supply chains.
Note from the Editor: Certainly TIA does not endorse the principles of Political Liberalism – a son of the Enlightenment – with the same ease as Mr. Jeffrey Tucker. However, we believe that his article is a lucid and valuable political-economical analysis of how the pandemic was handled and that our audience will profit from reading it. Mr. Tucker is an internationally known author, expert in social-economic matters and a Director of the American Institute for Economic Research. - A.S.G.
New York before & after the virus' unecessary impositions – a paralysis the government should have avoided
Thus do we live with the catastrophic results. It’s not a great depression. It’s a great suppression. Government set out one day suddenly to demolish the very foundations of liberal modernity. And they achieved this with certainty.
But did they save lives? Statisticians can find no difference in excess mortality between countries that locked down and those that did not – just as there is no relationship between a dance I do and whether it rains. Governments around the world embarked on a grand experiment in social control based on unproven theories and using untested methods.
It appears as if no good was achieved by any government in terms of disease mitigation. We are left with wrecked prosperity and ruined lives – plus a massive loss in confidence in public sector solutions all over the world.
This is a triumph, not a failure.
Perhaps the claim that Liberalism has failed is based on the belief that a free society cannot deal with pandemics. In fact, in the course of the 20th century, we have multiple incidences in which disease was handled very well in the context of freedom. Medical professionals got to work and sheltered the vulnerable while mitigating disease through scientific methods. The State stayed out completely in 1949-52, 1957-58, 1968-69, 2006 and 2009. Why we took a different path in 2020 is a mystery. Regardless it was an enormous error.
Dr. Donald Henderson who found the smallpox cure was strongly against the lockdowns & restrictions on freedom
That is precisely what has happened. The world will pay the price for decades. This is not the fault of Liberalism. It is the fault of terrible decision-making at all levels of society all over the world, with the possible exception of South Korea, Sweden, Japan and a handful of other countries. This is not a time for more government control. It is time to look again at the foundations of modernity and human rights and once again believe in them and practice them.
As for disease, no one wants to be sick. No one wants to make others sick unnecessarily. If we understand those two truths, we have the basis for understanding how a free society can deal intelligently with the presence of disease. People adapt and learn. Professionals get to work with therapies and finding cures. What precisely governments can contribute to this process is unclear.
Economist F.A. Hayek spent a lifetime showing that the essential knowledge necessary to cause society to function and thrive resides in the minds of individual actors. Government is not smarter than society. Nothing is gained by pretending otherwise.
What is needed now more than ever is an immediate restoration of free trade, free enterprise, freedom of movement, commercial rights and human rights. It’s a hard truth for governments to admit right now but they have failed all over the world. They need to admit it and leave us alone to restore prosperity and health.
American Institute for Economical Research - AIER - on May 21, 2020
Posted June 5, 2020