Dear TIA,

Greetings! I would like to address this question to Dr. Marian Horvat.

I was having breakfast with some friends of mine yesterday, and we were lamenting the fact that there is no moral manual available for us to use that could help us through some of the sticky situations we find ourselves in today. Someone brought up your name and your Manual on Catholic Civility, and we all agreed that something patterned after your manual would be an excellent approach to take with a moral manual. And then someone brought up the question about contacting you to see if you had ever thought of putting together something like this.

I know it's a lot to ask, but there is a big need for it. For example, there is a new manager where I work who is a lesbian and is often bringing up the topic of her "wife" and "stepdaughter." She is looking forward to introducing us all to her "family." I'm just not prepared for something like this!

From the physical standpoint it makes me sick, but from the moral standpoint, I just don't know what to do! There are all sorts of situations that we have trouble with. Another one is what to do whene someone uses Christ's name in vain. What is the best way to deal with this? It happens every single day out in the work world, at least once. What about when someone uses bad language in our presence? There are bad videos that are sent around, bad jokes are told...it goes on and on.

It's getting pretty scary to try to hold on to a job these days. Most of us can't just walk out on our jobs, and besides, the next place (assuming we could even find another job) would probably be just as bad or worse.

Is this something that you have ever given any thought to? You were the one who first came to mind when we decided we really need a moral manual. If you don't have the time, might you have any advice about someone else we may go to?

Thanks very much for listening, Marian - I know you're busy, and please forgive me if you think this was too presumptuous of me.

I know we should be asking advice from our priests, and we do, but it would just be really nice to have a resource we could all use in order to prepare ourselves for our little (and not so little) moral challenges which we face everyday.

     God Bless you,

     M.M.

P.S. - If you would like more examples, I can provide you with an ample list.




Dr. Horvat responds:

Dear M.M.,

Thank you for your consideration in thinking of me for this task. It is a big one, indeed, and I do not know if I can assume this responsibility. You cannot imagine the problems implied in writing a book. When the topic is Morals, the complications increase, because it demands a lot of study to undo the confusion created by so many progressivist clergy and prelates teaching the wrong doctrine.

Nonetheless, here at TIA an increasing number of friends and readers are telling us that they face similar situations on a daily basis and are also asking for orientation. Thus, something must be done.

I will not decide anything right now, but your suggestion is a good seed that may eventually germinate into an initiative that can meet your needs.

     Cordially,

     Marian T. Horvat

Dear Sir,

I recently read an article called "The Sydney Outrage", by Mr. Gary Morella, on your excellent website. I thank you for the wonderful work you do, day in and day out.

Although the site and the article have merits that must be given their due, there is one glaring defect: inability to make and face conclusions that are consistent with reality. The reason Benedict XVI, and his Vatican II and post-Vatican II predecessors act the way they do is this: they are not Catholic. As a man believes, so will he live. These men are, plain and simple, Modernists par excellence. Just as Modernism is not merely another heresy, but the synthesis of all heresies, so these men are not merely heretics, but are heretics par excellence.

Mr. Morella ends his article by stating "Until this fact is recognized and rectified by Rome, the problem will not go away." The reality is this: Until men like Mr. Morella recognize the eye-popping, obstinate non-Catholicity of the men parading in well-tailored, white cassocks from Gamarelli, who are pretending to be something they are not and cannot be, the "resistance" will go NOWHERE.A man will never - NEVER - effectively resist an enemy when he has not even correctly identified him as the enemy.

It is impossible - IMPOSSIBLE - that the V2 and post-V2 "Pontiffs" are legitimate. If they are legitimate, then Our Lord's promise that "he who hears you, hears Me" means NOTHING. For the past 40+ years, we have not been able to do what these men do, or even what they say. That is a sure sign that they are impostors, for Catholics have always been able, even during difficult days, to at least do what their leaders taught by word, if not what they taught by deed. Please prayerfully consider this reality, which you already know in your heart.

God speed, today and always.

     E.S.

Dear TIA,

I am a researcher in the Traditional Catholic Faith and converted to the true Faith 3 years ago (2006). Prior to that, I was a Vatican-II Catholic and was unaware that such a thing as the Traditional Catholic Faith and traditional congregations such as the SSPX actually existed - nor was I aware that the Latin Tridentine Mass still existed. I believe God directed me to the Truth and I am now a happy but inordinately curious Roman Catholic. I am an Indian and live very near to New Delhi, India.

I have recently come across the details of a shocking book authored by Fr. Arthur Terminello, a celebrated Catholic writer, The Illuminati and the Catholic Church. This book is advertised on the Omni Christian Book website. Fortunately, I was able to download this contents of the book from the internet and have read that a Cardinal by the name of Gennaro Granito Pignatelli di Belmonte was a Judeo-Illuminati satanist and a protege of Cardinal Marianao Rampolla del Tindaro - whose imminent election to the papacy was vetoed by Cardinal Pusyzna, Archbishop of Cracow on behalf of Austrian Emperor Franz Josef. I read the TIA articles on the Rampolla veto (here and here) quite some time ago and am aware of the politics of the 1903 Conclave. Strangely, though, I have not come across Cardinal Pignatelli in your TIA articles.

From Fr. Terminello's book, I understand that Cardinals Pignatelli and Rampolla, Marrano Jews, were primarily responsible for the destruction of the Catholic Church in the 20th century and that Cardinal Pignatelli had certain prelates murdered who dared to cross his path. However, what is shocking is that Fr. Terminello states that Cardinal Pignelli placed Cardinals Achille Ratti and Eugenio Pacelli in succession on the Papal throne, just the way Cardinal Rampolla placed Cardinal Della Chisesa on the papal throne. He also states that both these Cardinals were Marrano Jews.

It then would logically follow that both these Popes were puppets of the Judeo-Masonic-Illuminati, in spite of the fact that both Popes were noted for their anti-Communist stance and strong Catholic traditions. What strikes me as now logical is that both these Popes deliberately refused to consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of the Virgin Mary without any comprehensible reason, inspite of the overwhelming and awesome evidence of the Miracle of the Sun and the Virgin's conclusive propehesies. Do I then conclude that for obvious reasons both these Popes did not do so? So were Popes Pius XI and XII really serving the Catholic Church or are there now solid reasons to believe that they were anti-Popes? Can you throw some light on this serious issue?

     Thank you,

     R.F.



TIA responds:

Dear R.F.,

Thank you for your information.

We do not know if Popes Pius XI and Pius XII had any Jewish blood. Unfortunately, at this moment we do not have conditions to make a study to verify this point.

     Cordially,

     TIA correspondence desk

Follow us

  Is Sede-Vacantism an Ally of Progressivism?

  Pope Wojtyla Rewarded by Freemasonry

  Resistance Is Wrong; Sede-Vacantism Is Right

  Quo Primum vs. Novus Ordo

  The Catholic Manual of Civility