Religious Liberty, a ‘Monstrous Right’|
In our days, when we have Vatican II and the conciliar Popes upholding the revolutionary principle of religious liberty, it is good for us to remember that this is an anti-Catholic principle. Popes who followed the bi-millennial tradition of the Church condemned it and taught the opposite. Pope Pius VI, a contemporary of the French Revolution when religious liberty was first installed as a civil right, is quite explicit in his unqualified condemnation of it. He calls it a “monstrous right,” and an “imaginary dream.” TIA deems it useful to offer this document to its readers.
Pope Pius VI
The necessary effect of the constitution decreed by the Assembly is to annihilate the Catholic Religion and, with her, the obedience owed to Kings. With this purpose it establishes as a right of man in society this absolute liberty that not only insures the right to be indifferent to religious opinions, but also grants full license to freely think, speak, write and even print whatever one wishes on religious matters – even the most disordered imaginings. It is a monstrous right, which the Assembly claims, however, results from equality and the natural liberties of all men.
But what could be more unwise than to establish among men this equality and this uncontrolled liberty, which stifles all reason, the most precious gift nature gave to man, the one that distinguishes him from animals?
After creating man in a place filled with delectable things, didn’t God threaten him with death should he eat the fruit of the tree of good and evil? And with this first prohibition didn’t He establish limits to his liberty? When, after man disobeyed the command and thereby incurred guilt, didn’t God impose new obligations on him through Moses? And even though he left to man’s free will the choice between good and evil, didn’t God provide him with precepts and commandments that could save him “if he would observe them”? …
Where then, is this liberty of thinking and acting that the Assembly grants to man in society as an indisputable natural right? Is this invented right not contrary to the right of the Supreme Creator to whom we owe our existence and all that we have? Can we ignore the fact that man was not created for himself alone, but to be helpful to his neighbor? …
Man should use his reason first of all to recognize his Sovereign Maker, honoring Him and admiring Him, and submitting his entire person to Him. For, from his childhood, he should be submissive to those who are superior to him in age; he should be governed and instructed by their lessons, order his life according to their laws of reason, society and religion. This inflated equality and liberty, therefore, are for him, from the moment he is born, no more than imaginary dreams and senseless words.
Pius VI, Brief Quod aliquantum, of March 10, 1791,
in Recueil des Allocutions, Paris: Adrien Leclere, 1865, pp. 53-55.
Posted December 20, 2008
Related Topics of Interest
Liberty of Conscience: A 'Delirium'
Religious Beliefs against Homosexuality
When Liberty Becomes an Evil
At Lourdes Pope Bows to Liberty, Equality, Fraternity
Vatican II Turnaround on Church-State Relations
Hillaire Belloc the Liberal - His Thinking on the French Revolution
|Related Works of Interest|
Forgotten Truths | Religious | Home | Books | CDs | Search | Contact Us | Donate
Tradition in Action, Inc. All Rights Reserved