Homosexuality and the Clergy
Pedophilia | Hot Topics | Home | Books | CDs | Search | Contact Us | Donate
Good Reactions against Priestly Homosexuality
Margaret C. Galitzin
This is a bad news – good news story.
The bad news was the appointment of Fr. Arthur Mallinson, admitted homosexual who was involved in the pornographic St. Sebastian’s Angels (SSA) website, to a new parish in McKinney, Texas. I’m sure many readers will remember the scandal involving St. Sebastian’s Angels, the website-ring of homosexual clergy with alarming pornographic pictures and a chat room for participants to discuss anything from their open rejection of Church teaching to their perverse activities and fantasies.
Stephen Brady, head of Roman Catholic Faithful, blew the whistle on it in Fall of 1999, informing Bishops of the homosexual priests involved in SSA - 53 in all - and their lewd activities on the clandestine site. Two of the St. Sebastian’s Angels were Dallas Diocese priests: Fr. Cliff Garner, who has since left the priesthood, and Fr. Arthur Mallinson, who never – to my knowledge – faced reprisals for his involvement. Rather, he was assigned to St. Francis of Assisi parish in Lancaster, Texas, where many parishioners knew he was homosexual and said they didn't care. Then, after 10 years, he was transferred to St. Michael the Archangel Church in McKinney.
The words "But! But! He looks so harmless!" appeared under this photo of Fr. Mallinson in 1999 on the SSA website
Well, one ex-parishioner at St Michael’s did care. When Catholic writer Barbara Kralis discovered Fr. Mallinson was one of the priests who had been involved with St. Sebastian’s Angel’s, she expressed her concerns in her May 6, 2008, column on Catholic Citizens of Illinois website. Her questions hit home with readers:
At the end of her article, Mrs. Kralis asked readers to write the Bishop polite letters expressing their serious concerns.
- Why would Dallas Bishop Kevin Farrell promote a priest, an admitted homosexual who had been a member of a pornographic site for priests, to this large, stable parish?
- Shouldn’t families rightly be upset over such a priest being held up as the leader and model for their sons and daughters?
The good news
Now, for the good news. The story was picked up by LifeSite online news and various Catholic blogsites. Letters and e-mails to the Dallas chancery poured in – not just from parishioners of St. Michael’s, but from Catholics around the country. Then, area TV and newspapers ran and developed the story. Eight days later, on May 14, Fr. Mallinson resigned his post, stating he felt it was “in the best interest of the parish, his family and the diocese.” (Dallas Morning News online, May 14, 2008).
Mrs. Kralis, who set off the explosion, expressed her gratitude to the news media, websites, and the many letter writers who sent their protests to the Bishop. It is not often Catholics fighting homosexuality and perversion in the clergy receive such a quick victory. “The key was that the lobbying was done immediately and without fear or with lack of charity,” Mrs. Kralis noted in a note to campaigners, adding, “It’s sad that we, the laity have to correct the clergy, but remember Canon Law gives us that right and duty. … Mission accomplished, warriors! Mission accomplished!”
It is a small episode, but shows that sincere grassroots efforts are not always futile. As Catholics, we have the obligation to speak out on matters of Faith and Morals. And yes, it can make a difference.
Lies and cover-ups
I would like to end the story on a good note, reporting that the Bishop apologized, that Fr. Mallinson is entering reparative therapy. But that has not happened.
Instead there have been lies and excuses. Fr. Mallinson claimed – and continues to maintain - that he contributed to St. Sebastian’s Angels’ site when its purpose was to support homosexual priests in a chaste lifestyle. He says he stopped in 2001 when pornographic material began to be posted. Bishop Farrell is standing behind his claims, insisting that Fr. Mallinson’s “involvement on the website in question was strictly for spiritual and prayerful support” (Dallas Morning News, May 14, 2008). Diocesan spokeswoman Annette Gonzales-Taylor gave a television interview calling St. Sebastian’s Angels nothing more than “a support site for homosexual clergy.”
Dallas Diocese spokewoman Taylor pretends that the SSA site, below, only offered spiritual support for homosexual priests
All three – Fr. Mallinson, Bishop Farrell, and Ms. Taylor – are not telling the truth. Steven Brady, head of Roman Catholic Faithful, discovered the pornographic material on the site in 1999, two years before Fr. Mallinson pretends the depraved material suddenly appeared. Brady has clearly documented the perverse content and character of the site with its tales of sexual exploits and hysterical rants against the Church (1) for not being more open to the active homosexual lifestyle of priests.
1. Warning page from Roman Catholic Faithful leading to material from the St. Sebastian’s Angels website
So, Fr. Mallinson did not tell the truth. The Bishop and the diocesan spokeswoman are backing this lie, covering his participation on the vile SSA website as if it were no more than an honest endeavor of a homosexual priest to seek support and spiritual help.
In a note to this writer, Stephen Brady said, “I notified the Hierarchy eight years ago regarding Mallinson’s involvement in that homosexual website. They did nothing. I have learned over the years that the Bishops, for the most part, only fear public exposure and loss of funds. They do not seem to fear God at all. They cannot believe in the value of each soul and do what they do. Father [Mallinson] is a victim as well in one sense. No one in his family or Hierarchy loved him enough to set him straight. It was those who protested his appointment that showed true charity. May he someday see the truth.”
Episode ends on a sour note
The episode to date ends with a TV press statement made by Dallas Bishop Kevin Farrell, who oversees both the Lancaster and McKinney parishes. He seemed somewhat exasperated, not contrite, over having to appear to account for one of his priest’s past behavior. He only gave a simple statement to the effect that he is turning the matter over to a lay board to investigate the “allegations” about Fr. Mallinson.No questions were permitted to the press.
It really doesn’t make sense. Why refer this case to the review board when Fr. Mallinson is not being accused of abuse of children, but of homosexuality? All that is required is a simple judgment call on the part of the Bishop. If he needs any verification of the pornographic nature of the SSA site, it is all well documented by Roman Catholic Faithful.
Bishop Farrell washes his hands of responsibility in the matter
After reviewing it, he merely has to decide: Is Fr. Mallinson morally able to give direction to his parish and lead his flock to Heaven despite his participation in SSA and open admittance of homosexuality? Or should he be held to account for his participation in a grotesquely pornographic web-ring and subsequent lie?
I hope Bishop Farrell takes all this as seriously as he said he would. Since the Dallas meeting of Bishops in 2002, it seems clear that in general the Bishops refuse to even consider that homosexuality has played any part in the clergy sexual abuse crisis. Can’t they open their eyes to see what we, the simple Catholic lay people, can clearly perceive - that so long as homosexual priests continue to operate freely and with impunity, the Church will continue to wallow in scandals and suffer a crisis of confidence?
Posted May 19, 2008
Related Topics of Interest
Things of the Past?
Why the Priesthood will Continue to be a Gay Profession
Bertone's Theatrical Indignation
Did Cardinal Law Fall from Grace?
Cardinal Mahony and His Bleak Record
The Pedophile Spiritual Director of Mother Teresa
© 2002- Tradition in Action, Inc. All Rights Reserved